As I watch the news on the recent revelations about even more
info coming to light vis a vis Mrs. Clinton and her email situation, courtesy
of disgraced US Representative Anthony Weiner and his proclivity for showing
his body parts to members of the fairer sex, I keep coming back to one question
concerning all of Mrs. Clinton’s scandals. Why now?
She’s already been cleared of any criminal wrongdoing
concerning her use of a private email server. Although, in testimony before
Congress, FBI Director Comey’s responses to a litany of committee members’ questions,
at the very least, sounded like a disqualification against her bid to hold the
highest office in the land. The WikiLeaks brouhaha made her, her campaign, and
the entire Democrat party establishment (deservedly so) the objects of a lot of
scorn, derision, ire, and betrayal, especially among Bernie Sanders supporters.
The Russians, or at least hackers with ties to the Russian
government have been blamed for the release of these documents to Mr. Assange
and Company. The reason given, of course, was to directly or indirectly
influence the outcome of a US presidential election. The Democrats, the media,
and a few establishment Republicans feigned outrage over such an act, despite
the fact that we’ve had our own dealings overseas doing just that in the third
world.
I’m going to go out on another limb and suggest that it
wasn’t the Russians, the Chinese, or anyone closely associated with those
governments who pulled this off. I’m thinking that we need to look a little
closer to home. We have a hodgepodge of alphabet soup agencies in this country
responsible for maintaining the security of this nation and ensuring the safety
of its citizenry. In the process of accomplishing these tasks, they have been
empowered by an all-encompassing law that was passed in the wake of the 9/11
attacks. Of course, I’m referring to the Patriot Act.
Edward Snowden has been called a lot of things, patriot,
traitor, useful idiot, but the one thing that needs to be reinforced amongst
all reading this is that he was the source of the disclosure about how much
information that federal agencies like the NSA have been collecting on the
average American. In testimony before a Senate committee, James Clapper, the
Director of National Intelligence, was asked the question about whether he knew
that the federal government was spying on American citizens. His response was
that the government didn’t do so willingly. The senator posing the question
already knew that statement to be a bare faced lie.
In light of the fact that we now know that Big Brother
really is watching us, should it come as a surprise to anyone that those at the
highest levels of government would be given even more scrutiny? It has been put
forward by a television talking head or two that the NSA may actually have all
of Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. That should not surprise anyone, especially
in light of the fact that it was recently uncovered that at least one email
service provider may have been charging law enforcement agencies a fee for
emails collected on certain individuals, without a warrant. That’s right,
corporate America is getting rich selling our information to the government.
Barring any sort of written policies or agreements between the subscriber and
the company to safeguard personal info, this action is completely legal.
If the NSA had access to the trove of emails from Mrs.
Clinton’s servers, as well as gaining access to the accounts of those
individuals and organizations she may have been in contact with, then it stands
to reason that the folks poring through the information contained therein may
have become deeply troubled by the picture that was being painted for them.
These sorts of revelations would have been earth shattering, to say the least.
You have a candidate for the presidency of this nation who has engaged in the
very sort of activities that have sent “untouchable” mafia chieftains to
prison, yet their political masters, based on previous instances of corruption
and malfeasance at the highest levels of government, haven’t even bothered to
lift a finger.
It may be one thing for the hacks in DC to politicize the
security of this nation, but the Clintons have taken things a step further and
commoditized it. They have been able to capitalize on their positions of power
and influence to enrich themselves and their cohorts at the expense of the US
taxpayer and our national security (Google the name Uranium One). It’s not much
of a stretch to see how a fifth column movement could come into being with the
express purpose of exposing such egregious/criminal behavior. Remember, these
folks are not political. They are hard-working career people who swore an oath
to protect the Constitution, the very fabric of our republic, from all enemies,
foreign or domestic.
The question concerning who these documents should be
“leaked” to was a no brainer. The only major concern was how to cover their
tracks, or in this case, the fingerprint they would leave behind. Given the
fact that Vladimir Putin and his government had become a thorn in our sides
over the past few years, I’m sure that played a major role in deciding how to
disperse the trail of breadcrumbs in such a manner that there could be only one
conclusion drawn from what had transpired. Just about everyone fell for it,
they were successful.
Based on what we now know, due to waves of disgruntled FBI
agents who were about ready to mutiny, Director Comey was basically given no
choice but to re-examine any and all Clinton related emails coming his way
courtesy of one Anthony Weiner. But what if this wasn’t the only driver of his
change of heart? What if that fifth column I mentioned earlier was also
whispering into Mr. Comey’s ear?
Of course, what they’d be whispering to him about would be
the scope of information that they had collected on Mrs. Clinton, her campaign,
and the party establishment. They’d let him know that he didn’t need to feel
intimidated by his political superiors, that he wasn’t alone and that all he
needed to do to get back into the fight was to act on the information being
provided. This truly was becoming a conspiracy of light.
Pushing all of the political rhetoric aside, no one really
knows what a Trump or Clinton presidency would look like. All one can go off of
are the track records that the candidates bring to the table. In Mrs. Clinton’s
case, it’s one riddled with corruption, double dealing, malfeasance, and vote
rigging, to name a few. My guess is that this was more than enough for the
keepers of the flame to step in and actually live up to that oath of office.
Q: Who watches the watchers?
A: They’re doing a damn good job taking care of themselves.
When I first penned this piece, I figured that we had a national security establishment that was interested in protecting this country and its citizens. Little did I imagine at the time that we had bad actors within the top echelons of this establishmet willing to use the tools they had been given to defend us as weapons against a political candidate and his campaign. We now know with certainty that this was exactly what happened in the case of the Russia collusion narrative and the various pseudo-scandals that have been spun off from it.
ReplyDelete