I
don’t believe in coincidences when it comes to certain things, especially
politics. We’re constantly told that the president and his cabal conspired with
the Russians and other shadowy figures to swing the 2016 election his way. The
Mueller investigation was supposed to look into Russian interference in the
election, possible collusion with the Trump campaign, and possible obstruction
of justice in the firing of FBI Director James Comey.
There
has been no credible evidence to date of any wrongdoing by the Trump campaign or
anyone close to the president (Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen have legal/criminal
issues not related to the campaign). Ironically, what has come out of all of
this has been a slow steady drip of information that paints a completely
different picture of what occurred in the runup to the election and its
aftermath:
1. Sessions
recusal.
The Attorney General quoted incorrect policy in justifying his recusal on the Russia
matter. The question is, who steered him in that direction?
2. Memo urging the firing of
James Comey. Who was the author of the document and what was the impetus behind
it? Who were the endorsers of this document? If DAG Rosenstein had a hand in
the creation or vetting of the memo, would it not stand to reason that he would
face a conflict
of interest in appointing Robert Mueller to investigate Comey’s
firing?
3. Stefan
Halper.
He shares connections
with no less than three individuals in the Trump orbit: Sam Clovis, George
Papadopoulos, and Carter
Page. Michael
Flynn, and Michael
Caputo were also approached by other individuals with ties to the
government. Why were these individuals being targeted?
4. Natalia Veselnitskaya. The
lawyer at the center of the meeting at Trump Tower and claims of collusion.
She has yet to be interviewed by Robert Mueller. If FOX could get around
to interviewing
her, then why hasn’t he and his staff done so as well?
5. Julian Assange. Another
centerpiece of the Russia investigation. He has never been interviewed by any
government committee or entity (with the exception of Congressman
Dana Rohrbacher). The one attempt at outreach by the FBI was quashed
by none other than James Comey. This would have given Assange limited
immunity if he divulged the source of the hacked
DNC emails, as well as turn over classified documents given to him by
certain individuals who had been in the employ of the federal government (either
directly or indirectly).
6. Nellie Ohr obtained a ham
radio operator’s license in May of 2016. What reason
was there for her to get one? Her husband, Bruce
Ohr, was the fourth highest ranking official at DOJ. She worked for Fusion
GPS, the organization behind the now discredited Trump dossier that
was used as the primary document to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Carter
Page. Additionally, was the address listed on the license
really Mrs. Ohr’s residence?
7. FISA court. The government
went to the court four separate times for warrants using the aforementioned
dossier. Portions of the dossier were leaked to media outlets who
penned stories that were used to supplement the dossier as independently verified
info. Given what is coming to light, will the court investigate what could
possibly be a case of fraud perpetrated against it by DOJ and the FBI?
8. Unmasking of Trump
associates. As a result of the wiretaps obtained via FISA warrants, several
individuals in the Trump orbit had their names made public. These actions are
normally undertaken when they are in the national security interest. There was
no such justification that could be made by these unmaskings.
Who were the parties behind it?
We’ve been told by the left and
their shills in the mainstream media that there is no smoking gun to show that
there was any sort of conspiracy to get the president. Yet they’re the very
same folks who crow about every single revelation that might possibly
complicate things for the president as the smoking gun that will bring about
his eventual downfall.
Newsflash, any good investigator
will tell you that there seldom if ever is a smoking gun that implicates
anyone. It’s usually tough, tedious detective work that goes through fits,
starts, dead ends and the like before being able to produce any sort of credible
evidence. As stated earlier, the steady
drip, drip, drip of info coming out of the events listed above will show us a
few things about our government that we’ve been slow to recognize and
acknowledge. None of it good. In the words of Lord Acton “power
tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely”.
